As the great
Buster Olney pointed out this morning, the Nationals have now spent $22 million dollars this winter on the following free agents:
- Jason Marquis (2 years/$15 million)
- Ivan Rodriguez (2 years/$6 million)
- Scott Olson (1 year/$1 million)
With that figure in mind, who would you rather have: those three players (Marquis, Rodriguez, Olson) or
Aroldis Chapman, should he command the expected total of $15-$20 million dollars to sign?
If Chapman would sign for somewhere in the $15-$20 million dollar range, I'd have to choose him over those three based on Chapman's high upside and potential.
Your thoughts?